Summary
In her article “Helping Students Use Textual Sources
Persuasively,” Margaret Kantz attempts to make teachers aware of the way
students view the use of sources in their papers, and warns them of the
problems they will have to address in student writing if they want their
students to truly engage with their sources and come up with an original
argument. She argues that students must understand that facts and opinions are
both really just claims, and that in order to come up with an original idea for
a paper they must read rhetorically and find a gap within the conversation. In
addition to finding that gap (on any point in Kinneavy’s triangle), they must
answer the all important question—so what? Why is that gap a problem? These
many complicated tasks, when paired with the summary skills a student usually
already has, can combine to form an original, creative research paper.
Synthesis
Kantz’s article is reminiscent of Kleine’s
rant on the night library. Those students in the night library hunt for quotes
within sources that they can plug into their preconceived papers, without
really reading rhetorically the texts they are using. Kantz illustrates a
similar scene, saying “a skillful student using the summarize-the-main-ideas
approach can set her writing goals and even plan (i.e., outline) a paper before
she reads the sources” (80). Both authors concern themselves with the
disassociation between students and their sources. They are not entering in on
the academic conversation, as Greene would have them do, and as all of the
authors advocate.
Pre-Reading Exercises
The last argument I remember having where there was a
dispute over a fact concerned (nerdily enough) the full name of Mr. Darcy in Pride
and Prejudice. My opponent was insistent upon the fact that Mr. Darcy’s
first name was not Fitzwilliam, and I was emphatic that it was. We
settled the dispute by looking it up in a reference book. My opponent
acknowledged his error and left shamefaced.
Fact- A piece of information that is generally considered to
be true by most people.
Claim- An opinion put forth by a person who supports its
truth.
Opinion- A belief put forth and supported by a person.
Argument- A debate in which two or more parties make
opposing claims.
Questions for Discussion and Journaling
3) Kantz, in her mission to get students to alter their view
of “facts,” allows students to open up their minds to the possibility of using
sources persuasively. For example, when Shirley let go of the notion that all
of the historical texts she found were full of absolute “facts,” she could
allow herself to explore the reasons why some of the so-called “facts” didn’t
match up. In other words, she could begin to ask the types of questions
necessary to develop an original argument.
4) I don’t think Kantz contradicts herself when she says we
should view sources neither as stories nor as repositories of truth. Students
should not take what a source says at face value, because the “facts” the
student is reading are really just claims. Neither should students read sources
as “stories” because then they might read the sources with an eye to plot and
character, and subsequently skim over the real points the source is trying to
make. So really there is no contradiction with Kantz’s statement, for the two
warnings apply to different reading strategies.
Personal Reflection
I like this article both as an informative article for
teachers as well as a cautionary tale for students; I think a lot of students
can relate to Shirley. Though my writing process is more like Alice’s than
Shirley’s, I could never articulate what I did as “reading rhetorically”. Kantz
has introduced me to a new vocabulary to use when talking about writing the
research paper. I think I will use Kinneavy’s triangle when practicing my own
rhetorical reading strategies.
No comments:
Post a Comment